I found a post at The Blaze yesterday that angered me and at the same time frightened me. I feel that it is important for readers to hear what is on the video. The people on the video are using a classic “Saul Alinsky” tactic. Go to the link and judge for yourself. Then read the information below that Saul Alinsky taught!
Rules for Power Tactics:
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.Because Alinsky was sensitive to criticism that he wasn’t ethical, he also included a set of rules for the ethics of power tactics. You can see from these why his ethics were so frequently questioned.
Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical:
1. One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal interest in the issue.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
8. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” “Of the Common Welfare,” “Pursuit of Happiness,” or “Bread and Peace.”
Related Articles
- Summary Of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” (unionblognews.wordpress.com)
- The “Do Nothing” Congress and the “Golden Ass” Award! (devil67712.wordpress.com)
- From the NEA – What’s really behind the Wisconson protests! (devil67712.wordpress.com)
- JAMES TARANTO: ‘Take ‘Em Down:’ Would Saul Alinsky approve of the SEIU’s new anthem? Is this wh… (pajamasmedia.com)
- Larry Pratt – Out-Alinskying Alinsky (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- The Alinsky Tactics – Part 7 – The Eighth Tactic (alinskydefeater.wordpress.com)
- From Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals: Palin’s Attacks (thepalinexpress.wordpress.com)
- “Educate, collaborate, AGITATE!”: Alinsky’s teacher corps (michellemalkin.com)
- Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- The Outside Agitator; Saul Alinsky explains Community Organizing. (yourdaddy.net)